Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Stabilization

نویسندگان

چکیده

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is defined as a permanent chronic pain originating from the sacroiliac joint, limiting patient's daily activities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness minimally invasive stabilization by triangular titanium implants in patients with dysfunction. MATERIAL AND METHODS prospective evaluated who had underwent for use iFuse® implants. surgery performed solely under fluoroscopic guidance or together O-arm O2® mobile imaging system. clinical condition, Visual Analogue Scale preoperatively and one year postoperatively, previous surgeries lumbar spine region, occurrence complications were recorded. minimum follow-up period 1 year. RESULTS group composed 20 patients, whom 4 men 16 women. mean age 48.9 years. covered 21 joints. Improvement condition reported 17 cases (81.0%), no relief observed (19%). VAS score 6.1 points decreased 2.9 postoperatively (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS should be reserved experiencing an intractable all non-operative therapy failed. Key words: stabilization, dysfunction, O-arm.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.

What are the benefi ts of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion? Frank M. Phillips, MD: Traditionally, fusion of the sacroiliac joint has involved open exposure of the joint with direct decortication of the articular surfaces, followed by bone grafting with supplemental fixation. Minimally invasive approaches to sacroiliac joint fusion aim to reduce the morbidity associated with open appro...

متن کامل

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery

BACKGROUND Recalcitrant sacroiliac joint pain responds well to minimally-invasive surgical (MIS) techniques, although long-term radiographic and fusion data are limited. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the one-year clinical results from a cohort of patients with chronic sacroiliac (SI) joint pain unresponsive to conservative therapies who have undergone minimally invasive SI joint fusion. METHODS SI ...

متن کامل

Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion

BACKGROUND The mainstay of sacroiliac joint disruption/degenerative sacroiliitis therapy has been nonoperative management. This nonoperative management often includes a regimen of physical therapy, chiropractic treatment, therapeutic injections, and possibly radiofrequency ablation at the discretion of the treating physician. When these clinical treatments fail, sacroiliac joint fusion has been...

متن کامل

ISASS Policy Statement – Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

keywords: Minimally invasive surgery, sacroiliac joint fusion, policy Volume 8 Article 25

متن کامل

ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

The index 2014 ISASS Policy Statement - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion was generated out of necessity to provide an ICD9-based background and emphasize tools to ensure correct diagnosis. A timely ICD10-based 2016 Update provides a granular threshold selection with improved level of evidence and a more robust, relevant database.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae Et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0001-5415', '2570-981X']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2021/006